tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7167131.post8234674588845244976..comments2024-01-27T09:02:10.815-08:00Comments on Jim Davies: the Blog: How Many Papers Should I Review For This Conference?Jim Davieshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09958201922371210613noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7167131.post-31938110320456462822014-01-28T08:56:47.405-08:002014-01-28T08:56:47.405-08:00One very small point: cog sci submissions typicall...One very small point: cog sci submissions typically have 3 reviewers plus a "meta-reviewer", who doesn't write a full review, but does essentially the same amount of work, reading each paper, rating them, and producing integrative summaries. <br /><br />Given that, it's distressing to see in cold numbers how large the burden is per submitted paper. Maybe we should reduce the number of reviews per paper?Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15970102563804118365noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7167131.post-32706707986778393242014-01-27T07:53:31.245-08:002014-01-27T07:53:31.245-08:00Yes that is quite a few comments. If you review fo...Yes that is quite a few comments. If you review for multiple conferences each year (I did 6 last year), then the review burden is excessive. However I did not submit to every conference I reviewed for. In any case, I think you will be busy this year.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06961453365953458021noreply@blogger.com